|
DEDICATION
and
PREFACE
To
Our Lady, Conqueror of All Heresies, who warned us of the
coming apostasy, and promised to restore the Church
through the Triumph of Her Immaculate Heart
and
Pope Saint Pius X, the last canonized Pope, who defeated the
Modernists of his day. May the Church soon be blessed with
a Pope of equal greatness, who will rescue her from
the scourge of darkness that calls itself light.
“Were one to attempt the task of collecting together all the
errors that have been broached against the Faith and to
concentrate the sap and substance of them all into one, he could
not better succeed than the Modernists have done. Nay, they have
done more than this, for… their system means the destruction not
of the Catholic religion alone but of all religion.”
...
“Though they express astonishment themselves, no one can justly
be surprised that We number such men among the enemies of the
Church… [T]hey proceed to disseminate poison through the whole
tree, so that there is no part of Catholic truth from which they
hold their hand, none that they do not strive to corrupt.”
-- POPE SAINT PIUS X on the errors of the Modernists,
in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici Gregis"
PREFACE
With the death of Pope John Paul II and the election
of his successor, Benedict XVI, a new era has begun in the
history of the Roman Catholic Church. But the crisis that has
wracked the Church since the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965)
goes on, even if the faithful hope that during the present
pontificate measures will at last be taken to bring the crisis
to an end.
Over the past forty years a growing number of Catholics
have come to recognize what is manifest: that the post-conciliar
crisis began with, and has resulted from, a host of previously
unheard-of ecclesial innovations, imposed in the name of the
Council, which have provoked confusion and disorder and led to a
massive turning away from the Faith—an apostasy—in the Catholic
Church.
The theme of this book is that the Eternal Word
Television Network (EWTN) both exemplifies and promotes these ruinous
novelties, and thus has contributed to the crisis itself. It is
the author’s burden to demonstrate that with the departure of
its foundress, Mother Angelica, from a leadership role, EWTN has
taken a sharp turn toward what Pope St. Pius X condemned as the
heresy of Modernism, as it attempts to combine Catholicism with
rock and roll, show business and the worst novelties of the era
after Vatican II.
While EWTN was once a sign of hope for a Catholic
restoration, it has become instead a major factor in the
Modernist innovation of the Church since the Council: a mixture
of truth and error, orthodoxy and heresy, the sacred and the
profane. EWTN now functions as an organ of what is aptly dubbed
“New Church”—a kind of faux church that exists parasitically
within the host organism, which is the unchanged and
unchangeable Roman Catholic Church of all time. The author will
show that the unprecedented emergence of “New Church” is the
very essence of the post-conciliar crisis, and that this
development was predicted in the Third Secret of Fatima, as Pope
Pius XII indicated in a stunning prophecy that figures largely
in this book.
The author also shows that even as EWTN promotes all
manner of destructive ecclesial innovation, EWTN also presents
itself as the standard of authentic Catholicism and calls for
the shunning of Catholics who defend the perennial Faith without
alteration. EWTN is thus not merely a passive adopter of
novelty, but an active promoter of ecclesial revolution.
For these reasons, the author concludes, EWTN—a
worldwide television, radio and Internet presence—must now be
considered one of the foremost agents of Modernist apostasy in
the Church and a positive danger to the welfare of souls,
despite certain good elements in its programming. Thus, it is
not Catholics who defend the perennial Faith who must be
shunned, but rather EWTN and the rest of the “New Church”
establishment, which has been leading the Church toward ruin
over the past forty years of ecclesial decay and decline.
Should anyone take the trouble to respond to this book,
let him begin here, where the author stresses that he does not
intend to suggest that any of the EWTN directors or celebrities
mentioned critically in the following pages are all necessarily
subjectively guilty of apostasy, Modernism, formal heresy or any
other deliberate offense against the Faith. Such guilt is a
matter of Divine Judgment, and the personal piety and sincerity
of individuals is not in question here.
Words, however, have their objective meanings, and
deeds their objective consequences. It is the duty of every
Catholic to oppose words and deeds that undermine the Faith,
give scandal, disturb the good order of the Church and endanger
the welfare of souls—especially when those words and deeds are
televised throughout the world to audiences of millions of
Catholics and non-Catholics by a lay-run organization that has
absolutely no authority in the Church, yet creates the
impression that it represents the best of what the Church is.
The honest critic must confront the evidence presented
in the following pages, rather than turn the matter into an
outraged defense of the alleged subjective motives of this or
that person. Let the critic address what a person is shown to
have said or done, not what he “meant” to say or do according to
some hidden intention elaborated after the fact.
Nor should anyone who might wish to respond to this
book waste his time demonstrating that certain elements of what
EWTN presents are soundly Catholic. That this is so is not only
stipulated at the beginning of the book, but is in fact the crux
of the problem with EWTN: that it combines things of the Faith
with things inimical to the Faith, thus attacking the integrity
of what Pope St. Pius X called “the Catholic name.”
The combination of the orthodox with the heterodox is
the essence of Modernism. As Pius X declared in condemning the
writings of the Modernists: “Hence in their books you find some
things which might well be expressed by a Catholic, but in the
next page you find other things which might have been dictated
by a rationalist.” Let the critic, therefore, address the
evidence of things inimical to the Faith, rather than attempting
to prove what is not in dispute.
Those who direct EWTN may believe they are doing a
service to the Church and that they have the right to engage in
their public mission. It is the author’s conviction, however,
that if they consider attentively the evidence of what they are
promoting, they will no longer have the refuge of good faith.
Having taken upon themselves a public religious
mission, those responsible for EWTN become subject to public
criticism from fellow Catholics who, out of their own sense of
duty, oppose what EWTN is doing. And it is an act of charity,
not unkindness, to oppose errors—from whatever source—that
threaten the integrity of the Faith and therefore the welfare of
souls. It is in this spirit of fraternal correction, however
forcefully expressed, that this book was written.
January 6, 2006
Feast of the Epiphany
|